Os processos criminais de tráfico de drogas em Goiânia e a gestão diferenciada da punição

Abstract

The article in question aims to present some of the results of a study on sentencing decisions, in the first instance, of criminal drug trafficking cases in Goiânia. As a methodology, qualitative and quantitative techniques were used in the production and analysis of the database, in a comparative way, in an attempt to identify the legal behaviors of different judges, as well as the worldviews expressed in the legal documents and the narratives formulated in decision-making sentencing. The findings reveal an abysmal divergence in the way judges act in relation to this criminal matter. The differences found, in addition to expressing the internalization of different ethos about the social phenomenon of drugs and about the role of criminal law, show the configuration of different legal habitus, which, in turn, allow understanding how the differences of being of the magistrates themselves produces a differentiated management of punishment.